Today, a dear friend of mine sent me this story in my email.
Invisible Moms
I'm invisible..... It all began to make sense, the blank stares, the lack of response, the way one of the kids will walk into the room while I'm on the phone and ask to be taken to the store. Inside I'm thinking, "Can't you see I'm on the phone?" Obviously not. No one can see if I'm on the phone, or cooking, or sweeping the floor, or even standing on my head in the corner, because no one can see me at all.
I'm invisible. Some days I am only a pair of hands, nothing more: Can you fix this? Can you tie this? Can you open this? Some days I'm not a pair of hands; I'm not even a human being. I'm a clock to ask, "What time is it?" I'm a satellite guide to answer, "What number is the Disney Channel?" I'm a car to order, "Pick me up right around 5:30, please?"
I was certain that these were the hands that once held books and the eyes that studied history and the mind that graduated summa cum laude - but now they had disappeared into the peanut butter, never to be seen again. She's going, she's going, she's gone!
One night, a group of us were having dinner, celebrating the return of a friend from England. Janice had just gotten back from a fabulous trip, and she was going on and on about the hotel she stayed in. I was sitting there, looking around at the others all put together so well. It was hard not to compare and feel sorry for myself as I looked down at my out-of-style dress; it was the only thing I could find that was clean. My unwashed hair was pulled up in a banana clip and I was afraid I could actually smell peanut butter in it. I was feeling pretty pathetic, when Janice turned to me with a beautifully wrapped package, and said, "I brought you this." It was a book on the great cathedrals of Europe.
I wasn't exactly sure why she'd given it to me until I read her inscription: "To Charlotte, with admiration for the greatness of what you are building when no one sees."
In the days ahead I would read - no, devour – the book. And I would discover what would become for me, four life-changing truths, after which I could pattern my work:
1. No one can say who built the great cathedrals - we have no record of their names.
2. These builders gave their whole lives for a work they would never see finished.
3. They made great sacrifices and expected no credit.
4. The passion of their building was fueled by their faith that the eyes of God saw everything.
A legendary story in the book told of a rich man who came to visit the cathedral while it was being built, and he saw a workman carving a tiny bird on the inside of a beam. He was puzzled and asked the man,
"Why are you spending so much time carving that bird into a beam that will be covered by the roof ? No one will ever see it. " And the workman replied, "Because God sees."
I closed the book, feeling the missing piece fall into place. It was almost as if I heard God whispering to me, "I see you, Charlotte I see the sacrifices you make every day, even when no one around you does. No act of kindness you've done, no sequin you've sewn on, no cupcake you've baked, is too small for me to notice and smile over. You are building a great cathedral, but you can't see right now what it will become."
At times, my invisibility feels like an affliction. But it is not a disease that is erasing my life. It is the cure for the disease of my own self-centeredness. It is the antidote to my strong, stubborn pride. I keep the right perspective when I see myself as a great builder. As one of the people who show up at a job that they will never see finished, to work on something that their name will never be on. The writer of the book went so far as to say that no cathedrals could ever be built in our lifetime because there are so few people willing to sacrifice to that degree.
When I really think about it, I don't want my son to tell the friend he's bringing home from college for Thanksgiving, "My mom gets up at 4 in the morning and bakes homemade pies, and then she hand- bastes a turkey for three hours and presses all the linens for the table." That would mean I'd built a shrine or a monument to myself. I just want him to want to come home. And then, if there is anything more to say to his friend, to add, "You're gonna love it there."
As mothers, we are building great cathedrals. We cannot be seen if we're doing it right. And one day, it is very possible that the world will marvel, not only at what we have built, but at the beauty that has been added to the world by the sacrifices of invisible women and men.
***************************************
After reading this little tale, I felt completely furious and hit “reply” to let my friend have it. Then I realized that I would do better to share my irritation with the whole world, since the stupid attitudes embodied in this saccharine little piece are very wide-spread and my friend didn’t come up with it on her own. She’s guilty only of taking in some crap somebody fed her – but the crap is coming from alllllllll around.
Caveat: behind the cut, you’ll find some of the most vitriolic, lengthy ranting you’ll ever get from me. This topic burns me up like no other in creation. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
Crap, you say? But that story was delightful, so charming. Yeah, it kinda was, until one looked a little closer. Let’s do some analysis.
1. Why does this woman seem to think that it’s okay for her to be a servant and chauffeur for her children? Is she a single mom or something? Dad can’t drive them around? Never heard of carpooling? Is there some reason she can’t just say, “Pardon me, I am on the phone, please go away?” She must be really passive-aggressive. Why can’t she speak up for herself? Doesn’t she feel that she has to right to tell her children what to do? My parents sure were comfortable with that concept, and I’m at home with it too. I tell my kids to get lost, and I don’t feel one little bit guilty. This woman is a real doormat, not a real role model.
2. What happened to her studies of history? My mom got a B.A. in computer science on top of her old B.A. in mathematics, my dad finished his Ph.D and then went back for another Master’s. Neither one of them showed any sign of disappearing into the peanut butter, and what’s more, they were visibly annoyed with me when I stayed home with my kids for a few years. What’s this lady’s deal? Did somebody cruelly rip away her history books? No, she put them down all on her own and now she’s feeling sorry for herself.
3. So, she quit taking care of herself and went out to dinner in a disgusting old rag that reeked of stale food? Who made her do that? My mother-in-law raised 3 kids and never did that in her entire life, my mom raised 2 and can say the same. I myself have definitely gone out looking and smelling like crap, but I didn’t beat myself up about it or get down. I got my act together and I don’t do that anymore. Once again, this is passive-aggressive bullshit. Did the gypsies come by and steal all your nice clothes? Or did you just fail to take care of yourself? Don’t be a twit! Take a shower and put on clean clothes, it won’t kill you!
4. But all this ranting heretofore is just the warm-up for the really infuriating stuff. Now this person wants to say that raising children is like building a cathedral? Really? It’s sacred, and you’re like a holy priestess? Bitch, please! You are not a special snowflake. Even dogs and hamsters raise children. Quit acting like it’s such a big deal. It’s just a mammal thing. This is just a big propaganda gambit that people always want to trot out to justify the idea the women should want nothing more than to be mothers. Motherhood is a special offering to God! It’s so special, so holy, so wonderful, so fulfilling that you should be cumming your brains out just thinking about motherhood, by golly. Why, a woman who doesn’t want to be a mother is not even really a woman, she can never be truly fulfilled if her womb is unfilled! Yeahhhhhhhhh. Ever notice how nobody ever says things like that about men? Men never say, “Fatherhood is the greatest job I’ve ever had.” No, they say shit like that about climbing Mt. Everest or whatever. But for men, parenthood is never expected to be the be-all and end-all. Why is that? Why am I expected to be some kind of Holy Bride of Diapers, while my husband simply is not? What, God isn't watching men? Or maybe God doesn't give a darn if men reproduce? Or maybe. . . this thought-form is so stupid that only the window-dressing of Divinity is preventing everyone from realizing just how utterly worthless it is. Yeah, that's my vote.
5. “At times, my invisibility feels like an affliction. But it is not a disease that is erasing my life. It is the cure for the disease of my own self-centeredness. It is the antidote to my strong, stubborn pride.” What?!! Your invisibility IS an affliction! One you put on yourself, I might add! The disease erasing your life is your own crazy wrong-headedness! It is not self-centered to want to wear clean clothes and smell nice and have an enjoyable career! It is not pride to want to be your own person for part of every day! Snap out of it, crazy lady!
6. And last but not least: you don’t want your son to admire your hard work? You don’t want to be praised and receive due credit for your hard work? What kind of a dunce are you?! Oh, and why exactly did you get up at 4 am to bake? Because my mother, my mother-in-law, my sister and I, well, we like to bake the pies a day or two in advance, during normal daylight hours. Try it. You’ll like it. Yeah, and after we bake those pies and baste that turkey, we don’t try to pretend the Thanksgiving Fairy did all the work. No, we bask in the praise and adoration of those who receive our bounty – and you should too, crazy lady. If your family isn’t adoring your work, then let them do the damn baking and basting. It ain’t rocket science anyway.
And so, in conclusion, unknown crazy lady, please PUT DOWN YOUR MARY MARTYR CROWN and back away from the steaming pile of bullshit on your plate. Right now. And please, for everyone’s sake, quite trying to infect the rest of us with your self-defeating ideology. “Children, Church, Kitchen.” Who said that was the right path for women? Oh, yeah. . . Adolph Hitler, that’s who. Can we all please just leave this awful, sexist crap behind us? Please?
Whew! I'm worn out with all that ranting.
- A Visit From the Crazy Lady

2007-10-24 01:35 am (UTC)
OMG. You make me happy.
2007-10-24 01:37 am (UTC)
2007-10-24 01:45 am (UTC)
And I'd be all "yeah, and I'm about to be the life-taker-awayer, asshole, come a little closer."
2007-10-28 07:47 pm (UTC)
2007-10-24 02:16 am (UTC)
2007-10-24 02:37 am (UTC)
2007-10-24 04:13 am (UTC)
But the end, about building cathedrals and the fact thatr YOU don't have to finish it, and it's so beautiful and such a holy thing,I see some of that in child raising and I do think it's beautiful.
So I thought I'd share. Sorry to cause a ruckus. Perhaps next time I'll try to explain where I'm going with this.
2007-10-24 12:24 pm (UTC)
But to me, it is NOT a holy, sacred thing.
The reason we don't have to finish raising our kids is NOT because it's a neverending sacred task -- it's because it is their own damn job to finish growing up, which is just as it should be.
Giving birth and raising kids is very important and very wonderful. But acting as if GOD HIMSELF is staring at my every move, well, that is just too much pressure.
Telling me that, yes, it's your holy mission to wipe that shitty ass and what's more, you should act as if you really, really think that shitty ass is like the carvings on a Cathedral -- I mean, come on! It's like that lady wants to take away my right to hate the shit.
Of course it is important, and sometimes even wonderful. But don't act like it's holy, that's too damn much. Especially since, as I noted, NO MEN EVER SAY THESE THINGS ABOUT THEMSELVES.
And it is really, really, really wrong, completely wrong for anyone ever to act as if it's good to be invisible, or good for their family to ignore and take for granted all their hard work. That last point is one I particularly wish all the mother-type people of my acquaintance to remember. It's good to be the Queen, not the doormat.
And I apologize if I caught you off-guard with my ranting. This issue is one which just makes my blood boil. I refuse to let anyone make me feel like an inadequate mother just because making lunches doesn't get my pussy wet. I am a good mother even if I do not feel as this is [twee voice] "the best job I ever had." I love my children even if I don't regard them as Cathedrals. And I deserve, 100%, to be acknowledged for all the hard work I do.
And so you, Laura, and don't you ever forget it.
2007-10-24 04:02 pm (UTC)
The lady doth protest way too fucking much.
2007-10-24 04:20 pm (UTC)
(I found you via
2007-10-24 08:21 pm (UTC)
2007-10-24 04:31 pm (UTC)
I'm with you -- this analogy makes me froth. It's the worst rationalizations of the co-dependent elevated to religious iconography, which is perfectly in keeping with the dysfunctional narcissism of that kind of parent (dads can be just as guilty), and which also makes me froth.
Thanks for kicking down the scaffolds.
2007-10-24 04:32 pm (UTC)
OMG, what a lovely rant. The idea that mothers should give up their identity to motherhood is such utter bullshit. I tell you what, when I get home from a 9-hour day at work and people need supper and it's a class night for me, I'm not going to stay home and cook shit. I say, "Guys, order takeout," and I pick up my sword or gi and I head up to the dojo and I practice some whupass. Coz' mommy's a lot happier when she does, and that's a win-win.
You've got to take care of yourself or you're no use to yourself or anyone else.
2007-10-24 04:32 pm (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for the rant - you have no idea how wide I was grinning. I have two kids I adore, but yeah...motherhood was not and has never been my ultimate ambition. I do feel blessed to have my children, but for a long time I felt inadequate in some vague and undefined way because I could not make myself content with that sort of martyrdom and sacred motherness. Pfft. My kids know not to bug me when I'm on the phone. They know not to pester me if I'm scribbling notes for a story. They know that if the horses need to be fed and watered, dinner waits.
But they're okay with that because they *also* know I love them. So what if I don't hold my breath until they're home from school? So what if I bake brownies from a box because the damn things take too long to make from scratch? At least they know that *they* can be parents *and* people too.
I do not intend to fade into some obscure motherness...I don't *want* to be an invisible slave to my family. And you know what? My family doesn't want me too, either. Oh sure, things might be easier for them if I waited on them hand and foot - but what would they learn? What sort of people would they be? I think being who I am lets them explore who and what they want to be too.
Anyway, sorry for the random comment. Thanks so much for showing me I'm not alone. Thanks for expressing so well what the voice in my own mind has screamed.
2007-10-24 04:46 pm (UTC)
At first I was reading and I was kinda depressed because I hate been taken for granted. Then things fell into place. (yeah I'm slow *grin*)
My mother is that woman building her "cathedrals" and I can see how much it chafes her, and yet she expects the same from me, and I'll never match her in the holy martyr stakes because goddamit I like to be selfish.
Thanks for this . :D
2007-10-24 08:25 pm (UTC)
So I believe that we women should all feel free to achieve these things as well. It's not selfish! It's normal!
2007-10-25 04:08 am (UTC)
ot: do you mind if I add you to my reading list? We're both shimmiers, I see.
2007-10-25 04:13 am (UTC)
2007-10-25 04:23 am (UTC)
2007-10-24 05:04 pm (UTC)
2007-10-24 05:17 pm (UTC)
I'd like to add that raising your (general "your") children to view you as a doormat affects THEM too--in very negative ways. It creates infantile men and young women who unconsciously seek abuse. And it affects their future spouses and partners. Teach your kids to respect and value others instead of turning them into little sociopaths.
2007-10-24 07:35 pm (UTC)
Many women choose to stay home while their kids are young. Many women don't. Many women find fulfillment in the vocation of motherhood. Some women never have kids at all. Great. They're free to do anything and everything. So why the mommy wars? Why does it have to be only one way?
This is just a big propaganda gambit that people always want to trot out to justify the idea the women should want nothing more than to be mothers.
I see a lot of judgment and propaganda in this post, but it isn't in the email your friend sent you. Self-sacrifice isn't sexist any more than hedonism is feminist. My husband makes great sacrifices for our family, too. He plays with our son when he gets home from work instead of vegging in front of the TV. He reads stories that are of no interest to him in order to cultivate a love of books in our daughter. There are times when he doesn't want to be a dad, when he's tired and crabby and needs a beer. But he believes in what he's doing, just as I do, and so he sacrifices his wants for someone else.
I'm glad your family dynamic works well for you. Please consider that my family dynamic works well for me, too.
2007-10-24 08:40 pm (UTC)
No, I object specifically to the elevation of motherhood to a fetish object. A mother is not a sacred angel of the hearth. She's not a sort of kitchen nun. She is not to be taken for granted, or treated as a servant by her children. She definitely ought not to be invisible!
And if she somehow gets to being invisible, she ought not to be told that this is God's plan for her. God's plan might be for her to be a mother -- that's a wonderful thing -- but not for her, or any person, to be a slave.
I believe that God's plan is for each soul to shine, not to fade. To sing out loud and clear, not to be obscured by the background noise.
God does not require a mother to be a martyr. If He wants a martyr, He politely sends a bunch of persecution and a brutal death. (I'm thinking of St. Sebastian and St. Lucy.) If He sends you children and a loving family, He wants you to be happy, don't you think?
That's all I'm saying. That after receiving all these precious gifts from Him, it's quite insane to imagine that His plan is for us to be Invisible Moms, when quite clearly His plan is for us to Joyous Souls.
I'll even go one step farther. What does it say in Psalms? "Her works rise up and praise her in the gates." Praise her! Yeah, that's what is appropriate for a mom. There's no psalm that says, "her children walk all over her and she feels like a servant in her own home." No. See what I mean? Clearly not God's plan.
I could do a whole exegesis here, but I believe this is sufficient. I hope this has been a proper clarification. I welcome any reply you care to share with me. Thank you for taking the time to visit my blog and post!
2007-10-24 09:10 pm (UTC)
I see the "invisibility" part as a temporary state, limited to the children. You better believe moms should be appreciated! Their husbands, their friends, their family, society, everyone should support them. But it's not until their kids have kids of their own, pretty much, that they're visible as people to their children. I loved my mom and am grateful for everything she did for me, but it's not like I ever thanked her for cooking dinner on a nightly basis. Yeah, maybe I should have, but the fact that I was oblivious to her acts of service doesn't make her a doormat. Some work is invisible by its very nature, and the thank you's come in equally immaterial form.
Also, the woman in the email DID get validation. She got it from her friend who went to England. Her work as a mother is compared to some of the most impressive and beautiful monuments in the world. That's praise. Raising healthy, independent, caring kids is a kind of praise, too, even if the kids themselves don't say "Wow mom, thanks for getting up at 4 to bake this great pie."
I gotta say, too, I think motherhood IS in part martyrdom from the minute of conception. Maybe I only think this because I have such brutal pregnancies, but there's nothing fulfilling about severe hyperemesis that sends you to the hospital. Getting up with a sick child at 2 am is martyrdom. Accompanying a kid to a kids' movie is martyrdom.
I would definitely agree with you that our souls are meant to shine. But they can shine very brightly through humility and acts of service.
And why can't motherhood be sacred? I think any profession that is done with dignity for the good of others is sacred, ie: "set apart for the worship and service of God." Mothers, fathers, doctors, lawyers, policemen, environmentalists, hospice caregivers...all these things are sacred professions if they're done with love. Some of them are just more visible than others.
Thanks for the calm and insightful response!
2007-10-24 10:36 pm (UTC)
I guess if you want to consider parenthood to be sacred, that's your free choice. I just don't personally care for it, because to me it's just too much pressure. It's enough for me to feel at one with the vast community of animal and human mothers, a wonderful biological chain stretching back into our deepest past, and to know that I am not alone in my struggles. To imagine that I ought to view myself as more than a simple human being is just too much for me.
To me, birth is not martyrdom, no matter how painful it may be. (If memory serves, it was a lot like a flaming cannonball of lava blasting out of my fundament.) To me, it's a biological process that I share with every female mammal. To me, accompanying my kids to a kids' movie isn't martyrdom -- it's a privilege. A privilege to have the money, a privilege to have the time, a privilege that my asperger-y son can even sit through a movie. Getting shot like Dr. King -- that's martyrdom.
I think I object to the sanctification of motherhood because it just makes too much of it. After all, proctologists perform a nasty, thankless task and save the lives of thousands every year, and nobody calls them sacred, ordinarily. One could argue that our very society would founder without garbagemen, but nobody calls them the "angels of the refuse heap." One could argue that fathers are at least as sacred as mothers, yet I've never seen an Invisible Dad story circulating. Psychiatrists help thousands literally escape despair, yet we don't call them "angels of Ritalin."
So, too, mothers. Why isn't it enough to just be a mother? To be a part of the great chain of life?
And who will benefit from convincing me that mothering, rather than a normal stage of life, is instead a sacred task? Hmmm.
2007-10-25 04:40 pm (UTC)
1. I think you and I are reading the woman's story from wildly different perspectives. She's not saying that she is holy or that reproduction is the penultimate model of sanctity. She's saying that in serving others (her children) she is serving God. Her cathedrals analogy means that even when the many small things she does are not praised, they are still valued and therefore worth doing.
I certainly don't think a mom should feel obligated to read The Cat in the Hat 18 times in a row simply because her 3 year old wants her to. I do think that if she chooses to do so, putting aside her immediate desires, she should be able to take comfort in the knowledge that her act of service is valued by God, even if it isn't noticed or appreciated by her child.
2. Have you heard the phrase, "Anyone can be a father, but it takes someone special to be a dad."? There's a difference between reproducing and parenting. It can be done well -- with joy, sacrifice, care and love -- as a gift to God. You can reserve "sacred" for clergy and Dr. King if you like. I happen to think we can serve God in everything we do, from smiling at a homeless man to changing a baby's diaper.
Who benefits from your efforts to diminish the role of motherhood to a biological function?
2007-10-25 05:49 pm (UTC)
-->All the women who face opposition when they decide they want a life as something other than chattel.
Being a mother isn't necessarily a life as chattel, but being a mother under the conditions this story describes is.
2007-10-25 08:40 pm (UTC)
Certainly, however, my reaction to the story was heavily colored by my own experiences with depression. If you haven't ever suffered from this crippling illness, your perspective is indeed different from mine in that respect.
Having said that, I'd like to focus on your quote: "Anyone can be a father, but it takes someone special to be a dad." As you noted in your comment, this little maxim explicitly differentiates between reproducing and parenting in the case of a male. Even a married man may be a father, or he may exert that extra effort and actually be a dad.
What is the similar maxim which refers to a female parent? There isn't one. Our culture has not even started to imagine a woman who could be like a father. There's no equivalent status for a woman -- a biological parent who isn't all that involved, who's there and who loves you, but who just isn't shouldering the lion's share of the work. Why do men have this option, linguistically speaking, yet women don't?
I think it's wrong of us women to hog the glory of parenting that way. Maybe it is even sexist. Why do men not feel that they ought to be so involved? Why doesn't our cultural narrative of parenthood subsume the father the way it does the mother? Why isn't there any Invisible Daddy Story? Why aren't men experiencing the same issues with parenting that women are?
Don't men get to serve God through their children?
I want men to be more like women that way, more free to access their masculine tenderness, more free to love their children completely as women seem to do. I want this because I believe it's good for people to fully experience their whole selves.
But I want women to be more like men - more free to choose otherwise without any guilt, more entitled, more. . . I can't think what the right word is. I particularly want any women who are childless for any reason to feel free of any pressure or stigma, just as men who are childless do. I want this because I believe it's not good for people to feel trapped.
And to answer your last question, I believe that everyone, both male and female, might benefit from knocking motherhood off its false ideological pedestal. When women and men have more congruent experiences of parenting, all our future children will be able to grow up in a world where men and women truly respect each other.
I can't tell you how much I appreciate your participation in this discussion. It isn't any fun discussing things with people who just agree all the time. If you've felt a little bruised by some of my friends' behavior, please accept my apology on their behalf. They're a bunch of rough customers, but they mean well. Thank you so much for sharing your viewpoints with me!
2007-10-25 08:58 am (UTC)
I knew much, much, *much* sooner that my Mum was an entity in her own right. I helped her paint anti-rust spots on her car when I was three, because she felt that if her car was a rustbucket, it might as well stand out!
As for Martyrdom: sure, there are less-than-wonderful moments, but you get that with a pet, too, and you even get that cleaning up after yourself when you're ill: it's not nice, but someone has to do it, and that someone is you, so get over it.
Getting up at 2am when your child is sick... do you *really* have anything better to do? Accompanying a kid to a movie: you get to see how your child sees its world and share in the discovery thereof - how cool is that?
Last but not least, you don't get independent and caring kids if you allow them to walk all over you. Respect must go both ways - and just as you ought to respect your kids, they should respect you.
2007-10-25 04:46 pm (UTC)
Caring for your children and teaching them manners are not mutually exclusive. I think it's important to model service without expectations. Otherwise your kids will be forever wondering what's in it for them.
2007-10-25 05:33 pm (UTC)
Having a kid is just the same comittment on that level. You *know* that having kids entails sleepless nights and being driven mad by toddler tantrums and all of that. Dealing with those things isn't nice, and it can be nerve-wrecking, but it's hardly unexpected, and you hardly deserve anybody's pity on a general basis. Of course I feel for you if you are short of sleep the third night in a row or faced with Yet Another Mess, but you don't get a halo for it. Most of us do it at some point or another. People who look after elderly or disabled relatives are in the same boat, for instance.
I think it's important to model service without expectations. Otherwise your kids will be forever wondering what's in it for them.
This is one of those statements that at first sounds immanently sensible - you *really* don't want kids that hold out their grubby paws every time they're asked to do something.
But just step back and think about 'service without expectations'. It's a misnomer: the person providing the service might not expect any compensation, because they feel it is their duty to provide it (and for a certain level - see above - I think that is appropriate, I think there is a basic level of humanity that ought never be able to be questioned). Perversely, this creates an expectation in the person being served: they _expect_ to be served thus. It's one thing to look after someone who is not capable of contributing to a household - pets, small children, the ill or infirm - and another to play the servant to someone who _can_. (And that includes husbands!)
And of course 'service without expectations' is never free. The person providing endless, selfless service, who always puts others before themslves, tends to expect moaning rights later. 'I've given everything up for you' 'I've always done everything for you' etc etc are phrases that nobody should be subjected to.
Caring for your children and teaching them manners are not mutually exclusive.
Indeed. But it is especially when service is not taken for granted that is tends to be valued...
2007-10-25 08:39 am (UTC)
My hackles rose right after the first paragraph, because I was certain I knew where it would lead, where it *had to* end - there is only one satisfying solution for the woman who is so run down and taken for granted that everybody uses her shamelessly: she has to emancipate herself.
Only this piece turned into Mothers of Gor: 'I may be abused, but I've come to love it.'
Unlike
That 'antidote to pride' thing is a whole other kettle of fish. To me, a human being who thinks they deserve to be humbled and treated as a maid-cum-chauffeur-cum-cleaner with no personality of their own, and who embraces that narrative is in dire need of therapy. It is not a healthy attitude. (And as you rightly point out, not one adopted by men, at least very, very rarely.)
Last but not least, she's not doing herself, her sons, or the world a favour by raising male chauvinists: boys, too, can share household duties; and if they expect the same level of martyrdom from their college-age girlfriends, they're gonna learn a hard lesson: if you want someone to bake cakes at four in the morning, do it yourself.
2007-10-25 12:24 pm (UTC)
And I have to admit something. . . I do understand being so tired and depressed that studying is out of the question. The story just made me so mad that my compassion temporarily got turned off, I guess.
And I agree with your analysis overall -- did you have a peek at my subsequent post? Thank you for bothering to visit me, and double thanks for taking the time to post. Welcome to my tiny corner of the net!
You are awesome!
2007-10-25 05:57 pm (UTC)
invisible mom
(Anonymous)
2009-05-13 09:44 am (UTC)
Then I was curious about the author and googled it and found out more. And I saw that the story was pasted lovingly into numerous sickening websites.
Also I saw that the original story was slightly longer and included a bit about the husband acting as if Charlotte wasn't there at a party, and about the son acting like he was walking along the street alone...
But I digress.
Why not join me on the following blog http://sunlituplands.blogspot.com/2009/0